The problem with the 15 euros membership fee is that what is monetized is not so much the time spent on the design of the site (and I know what it is (see the topic on the accordion chord dictionary, even if the quality is much lower, it takes time)) but rather the quantity of scores available. But these scores were left by people who thought they would be available in self-service... I understand completely the anger of lionel...
For those who don't want to contribute, you should know that Google likes above all to archive the web... a simple search :
'site:partitions-accordeon.com filetype:pdf'
brings back 61 pages including 443 scores in pdf, nothing prevents you from specifying the search by adding the name of a composer or a song.to see the Pdf, click on the link Display, you will then be able to print it or even save it (first in google document, before getting it back home) if you have a google account
Jouan