Hello to all,
given my taste for politeness, rigor and respect of the consensual rules necessary for the good functioning of a site like this one, I don't intervene much in these fields, for fear of being too "incisive".
I will make a small exception:
Yes our friend Musettina11110 makes and has made considerable efforts to acquire the mastery of a computer tool that he was discovering, or almost, and it is normal and justified to point it out and to thank him for it.
Yes, TOO many other applicants continue, in spite of the JUDICIAL remarks addressed IN PRIVATE, to ignore requests which have only ONE PURPOSE: to improve the presentation and the accessibility of P-A.
Yes cindou11 is doing a CONSIDERABLE job in the right direction, and without showing off, she has the same tools as me and all the qualities to assume her recent function of moderator.
Yes, all the time spent correcting "ridiculous" mistakes (writing correctly the title and the name of the composer does not seem insurmountable to me) should be saved.
Yes, if his requests remain unanswered I will simply delete the concerned repositories (my patience with the obvious bullshit of g..... has limits)
Yes you can find on Partitions-Accordéon many accordion scores ;) (well yes, not so surprising after all)
Yes they are often old pieces, probably the old composers had other qualities.
Yes, contrary to other sites, the ridiculous tinkerings taken from exotic files by flat handicapped people are not welcome here, we can't blame the majority of the members for being real musicians.
but, to answer daniel77 (and Isabelle) :
Yes, on simple request I will make a statement, even mediocre, of the pieces you want, as often, you can testify. There is nothing really surprising that the scores of recent "artists" are not bought and shared.
"The show must go on" and it is we who set the tone and tempo for the good of all.
thank you for your attention,
JJ